
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 11:06:12 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Open Access Journals
- References: <53292BF2.6030309@dcook.org> <CAAhy3dsA3yJ+dhP8y5AnkDm0Rhepfe6TyxXwENkiWtrqtqAgYQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140322100123.920638c262ed2e35be0ecc2d@kinali.ch> <87zjkggv3n.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20140326092128.ce15a21d03bfafbbcfd660d5@kinali.ch> <87wqfgown8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ppl7ou5g.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20140330123127.db17cd41959005fa6002d3c6@kinali.ch> <8761mvoe5x.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <CAAhy3ds-Tfno8KrsexFnB3CracrTYUpM962HD4jETsVaVAKxhA@mail.gmail.com> <8738hznmc9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <CAAhy3dv+rG14dht0naZCdnoR=ADGgEStOCxd8awa+AmtCwB=qw@mail.gmail.com> <533DFA42.5030206@dcook.org> <CABHGxq6w65ups4fFZ8x=o5WBjk78ch-To611842o9Z1owg=y_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Jim Breen writes:
> chew over a lot of very noisy data and then come to conclusions
> based on results that aren't within a bull's roar of being
> statistically significant (I majored in stats way back in the 60s.)
> Still "social scientists" have been getting away with that for
> decades.
Hey, as a business economist engaged in case study/interview research,
I resemble that remark. I guess I should mail Guido and Matz and tell
them their testimony was worthless, eh?
;-)
But yeah, I take your real point to be that you're all un-n-n-ZAAAA-ri
about taking criticism about the way you do research.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index