Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] SSD caching of 10x 10GB files on slow NAS
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:55:42 +0900
- From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] SSD caching of 10x 10GB files on slow NAS
- References: <CAL=gY80QoGCW9_TnDBF7ix_qyO72iBmaxoWNUKS9LZow9RhYag@mail.gmail.com> <CAKXLc7fFCCvFp=2Hu889pYu_smjTsj+2CeSc6oTZnFchT18ZeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL=gY82vfHKR0DWxq5RwaTmqbk4Q5Tit1Bq_mN1ok0jqKd4PGQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKXLc7eRXSDuhL6bZHwaMFW2X=KyKdrbp+Ybq=DPxjC+RJhyiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121228084528.6a4ab8f5.jep200404@columbus.rr.com> <CAKXLc7fHeVdYXro7awBUHO_QyT218GUOfGr+o2NtT1j9-yy8Zw@mail.gmail.com> <20121228121733.36ca8738.jep200404@columbus.rr.com>
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 2:17 AM, <jep200404@example.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 23:43:32 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:45 PM, <jep200404@example.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:57:55 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me.kalin@example.com> wrote: >> > >> >> 960GB SSD with 1.5GB/s R/W >> > >> > 1.5 Gigabytes/s is smoking! Did you mean 1.5 Gigabits/s? > >> Yes, it is smoking: >> http://www.ocztechnology.com/ocz-revodrive-3-x2-pci-express-ssd.html >> 1.5GB/s read, 1.3GB/s write, 230k iops >> >> So, 960GB drive is read into /dev/null in about 11 minutes ... > > Wow. That is _seriously_ smoking. Awesome! > > I can see how it might be hard for the rest of the computer to > keep up. It'll be interesting to see the output of the following > (with sda modified for the correct drive) when you get around to it. > > time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M > $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sync; /usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/md127 of=/dev/zero bs=1M count=100000 100000+0 records in 100000+0 records out 104857600000 bytes (105 GB) copied, 127.346 s, 823 MB/s 0.02user 33.36system 2:07.34elapsed 26%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 7536maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1major+529minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sync; /usr/bin/time dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/pictures/100G bs=1M count=100000; /usr/bin/time sync 100000+0 records in 100000+0 records out 104857600000 bytes (105 GB) copied, 97.4376 s, 1.1 GB/s 0.05user 58.80system 1:37.45elapsed 60%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 7536maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (3major+527minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.00user 0.00system 0:05.41elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 2464maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (1major+203minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ ls -lsh /mnt/pictures/100G 98G -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 98G Jan 4 02:47 /mnt/pictures/100G Well, just half of "advertised"... I'll see if it can be improved. Beats me why writing is faster (even with added sync). Anyway, that was just a quick test, I'll report more when I start using it more and I hope to get it run faster. For now I am happy it runs at all (there was bug 51881, so linux-3.7.1 was not working, fixed now). Cheers, Kalin.
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] 文字化け problem
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] 文字化け problem
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] 文字化け problem
- Next by thread: [tlug] [CFP] Call for presenters - Jan 26 Technical Meeting
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links