Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 12:32:28 +0800
- From: Raymond Wan <rwan.kyoto@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- References: <CAJA1Y2YMkk_5zub8HbUEXD-wenEmmGSOaB0nauhkT2+C97CVmA@mail.gmail.com> <87ehpvbvkj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <CAJA1Y2ZY+W0gVXydvOXywQTMGYGR928HUGCTZ0u2gsKfNHMv0w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, it is verbose for directories (and directories only): > Unchanged files > are not logged, as expected. The result is that I get thousands lines mails, > for nothing, > and I cannot find easily what was really changed (for directories)... I was just playing around with it and, for me, rsync doesn't print out the directory names if the time stamps on the directories haven't been updated. So, I guess the problem isn't just that the directory already exists, but the source directory's time has been updated and because of this, rsync searches inside it. One option is to fiddle with the time/date at the source or destination directories. That is, match up the time if there are no files inside have been changed. Of course, if you get it wrong, then you're not going to get the directory backed up... So, it's a dangerous thing to play with. :-) Ray
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- From: Bruno Raoult
- References:
- [tlug] Help on a script...
- From: Bruno Raoult
- [tlug] Help on a script...
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- From: Bruno Raoult
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Help on a script...
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links