Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 23:49:03 -0400
- From: jep200404@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- References: <CACDLhbYVe3AQqvP0uzSpqX073ZA9Tu=g+tMPrLz_t8fQ24h8sw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:30:11 +0900, Lyle H Saxon <llletters@example.com> wrote: > I suspect those two old 486 Dynabook computers I had (which were made > before flash memory was in production > So - before the > advent of flash memory, no power meant meant no memory, didn't it? No. There are several non-volatile memory[1] technologies that predate flash: mask ROM[2], PROM, EPROM[3], and EEPROM[4]. Flash is derived from EPROM. Almost all BIOSs are in non-volatile memory. Mask-ROM, EPROM, and flash are the commonly used non-voltile memories used for BIOSs. Everything uses flash now. Before flash, EPROM was dominant. A few manufacturers used mask ROM as Kalin wrote about. Mask ROM is forever. EPROM and flash forget over decades. [1] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Non-volatile_memory [2] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Mask_ROM [3] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/EPROM [4] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/EEPROM
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
- References:
- [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- From: Lyle H Saxon
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Favorite Linux laptops these days?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Favorite Linux laptops these days?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Flash Memory History & BIOS Durability (or lack thereof)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links