Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:32:09 +0900
- From: Raymond Wan <rwan.kyoto@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- References: <4E1E5496.3010309@example.com> <20110714154314.a8f7f1e6.attila@example.com>
Hi, I'm not sure if the following is relevant, but ... On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Attila Kinali <attila@example.com> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:29:42 +0900 > Darren Cook <darren@example.com> wrote: > >> Any thoughts as to how I confirm this, and get it running at full-speed? >> (Ubuntu 10.04, 64 bit, linux 2.6.32) > * Is your system really cpu bound? Is it not I/O bound or memory I/O bound? > If you can, have a look at the cache hit statistics (don't know what tools > to use for this) /usr/bin/time's man pages might be helpful. On Debian, maybe the number of page faults (%R) or number of times the process is swapped out of main memory (%W) might help. I guess if you're evaluating the CPU, you would prefer to have very little swapping. While you're at it, you can also compare the user, system, and real times -- ideally, the system time should be small so that all of the elapsed time is used by the process. And I believe if you have MPI installed and run your program under mpirun, there is a way to configure it so that your program runs on a specific CPU (they might refer to it as a "slot"). I'm not sure about this; it's been a while since I played with this part of MPI. Ray
- References:
- [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- From: Darren Cook
- Re: [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- From: Attila Kinali
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] How to proceed with RAID drive failure
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] CPU speed: reported vs. actual
- Next by thread: [tlug] Disposing of a hard drive (How to proceed with RAID drive failure)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links