
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Mac OS X: bad super block has become Unsupported sector size (0)
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 12:24:11 +0900
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Mac OS X: bad super block has become Unsupported sector size (0)
- References: <BANLkTi=TkqhnrjOvQmepK_RfLHRO2s60HA@example.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0b13pre) Gecko/20110314 Thunderbird/3.3a3
On 21/05/2011 11:22, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> First I tried to fsck the HDD and it complained about a bad
> superblock. It tried to use alternate superblocks but couldn't find
> any suitable ones. I manually forced it to use the first alternat
> using fsck -b 32 but it still complained, same for trying to use the
> last one.
Oh dear. OS X's fsck is not particularly filesystem-aware. It is what linux
would call fsck.ufs - i.e. it assumes that everything checks is a UFS
filesystem. Since you're later trying to mount it as MSDOS, I suspect this
will have trashed your data.
> I then did a newfs on the HDD thinking this would regenerate the
> superblocks.
If the fsck didn't trash your data, the newfs most certainly will have done.
> macmini:~ jci$ sudo /sbin/mount_msdos /dev/disk1s1 /Volumes/ELEMENTS/
> mount_msdos: Unsupported sector size (0)
It's not MSDOS any more. Who knows what it is.
> I'd be happy at this point if I could just mount the drive so I can
> move my files off it to a new HDD.
It's probable that there aren't any files left to move. Sorry. :(
My advice would be: get it into a Linux box. Image the filesystem *now* before
doing anything else with it. Try fsck.vfat and hope for the best, although
probably the FATs have already gone. :(
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index