Re: [tlug] comand-line recording...

[Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com>]

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 21:23, Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com> wrote:

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 20:03, Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> wrote:

On 2009-09-26 19:05 +0900 (Sat), Bruno Raoult wrote:

> Eh? are you joking? Even "script" will be acceptable (sending for
> instance to syslog, so that I have no write access)... I asked if
> there was a lighter solution, not a heavy one :-)

Well, you are in a very unusual situation, then, in that it's ok if
users subvert the logging system, so long as they do it in some other
way than modifying the file that script writes after the fact. E.g.,
this log of command, which does not include the one I ran between stty
and exit, would be fine for your compliance process:

Oh, you are right. I should have written "audit", not "compliance". "Compliance"
means much more security needs, as you said, and I agree...

This was not my point.

Bruno.

-- 
2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2.