Mailing List Archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tlug] domain registration/deletion problem



Oh, my mail made it finally to the list! I thought it had been lost in cyberspace for good and that I better rewrite it before posting it again when I have calmed down. Then my English would also be more understandable or rather I would make a clearer distinction between my own opinion and the opinion of the reseller, like in:

> My mistake was to take this provider and not their company. They had > lost so much money because of my provider and still help me.

Don't feel too sorry for the reseller.
That was the reseller's opinion, feeling sorry for themselves because I accused them of irresponsibility and blackmail ("if you don't become our customer we will not give permission to restore your domain").

But in the meantime I got an answer in which he wrote that he does not admit being guilty of anything, but that that they are taking my case seriously and discussed it within the comapny and decided that in future they send mails to the domain owners when they terminate the contract with a reseller so that the owners can react in time.

Curt Sampson schrieb:
I'm not entirely clear on this, but it sounds as if there are three
companies involved:

    1. The TLD registry for .net, which actually distributes (or not)
    the domain information,
That would be VeriSign, responsible for net Domains?
    2. The registrar for your domain, which will be one of many who
    deals with consumers directly, takes their money, and pays the
    TLD registry to enable the domain, and
From Whois: ICANN Registrar: CRONON AG BERLIN, NIEDERLASSUNG REGENSBURG
    3. Your Internet service provider (ISP), who provides you with
    some sort of Internet access and/or hosting, and who also may have
    registered the domain with a registrar on your behalf, or may be
    a registrar and have registered it with the TLD registry.
My provider are some (probably former) friends of mine with whom I used to share a root server. They did the registration. They are so hopeless ... I better don't get into details.
There may be a fourth company, another registrar, involved here too.
Yes, between the Cronon AG and my friend's company there is the reseller, the domain-offensive.de. So the chain is: me -> my friends -> domain-offensive -> Cronon AG.

If you could clarify this, and give us the names of the companies (so
that we can verify that they are what you think they are), it would help
to solve this problem.

In the whois record is listed:
- the ICANN Registrar: Cronon AG
- Owner Contact: that is me
- Admin Contact: also me
- Technical Contact: my friends
- Zone Contact: my friends

Domain-Offensive is listed nowhere.


Stephen J. Turnbull schrieb:
The problem is that you are "owner" in the sense of listed contact,
but you are not owner in any legal sense as far as I know; you are
merely renting the right to use the domain, and the service of having
it listed on the root DNS servers.  In fact, I would guess you were
re-re-renting it from ISP, which was re-renting it from the reseller,
which was renting it from the registrar, which appropriated it from
the dictionary according to rules established by ICANN.

You had better get legal advice.  I suspect that Germany and/or the EU
has certain regulations in place, and that is why the .de domains were
treated differently.
For the Denic "the domain owner is the DENICs contractual partner and holds the the material rights in the domain." Well, that is my attempt to translate: "Der Domaininhaber ist der Vertragspartner DENICs und damit der an der Domain materiell Berechtigte." (http://www.denic.de/domainrichtlinien.html)
I would call the EU regulator on these matters.
How can I find out who that is?
They might not be pleased that the reseller (who is presumably a
German entity?) is playing these games, just because the top-level
domain is different.
The reseller is German, like the registrar, my friends and me. Just the TLD is not German.
I am pretty sure that there is a regulation that
the affected customer (you, I mean, not the provider) be contacted.
It might very well conflict with another regulation regarding honest
dealing with the reseller's direct customer (see below); that's why we
need lawyers.
I start to understand this conflict and the perspective of the domain-offensive. Before I just found it ridiculous that someone not listed publically anywhere can block the restoration of my domain and that I have to press this information from the Cronon AG.

> Also my problem is not only about the restoration fee. My site had quite > a nice google ranking, second place after the book on which it is based. > I have several other domains pointing on it now, but still my site > cannot be found via google (i.e. most of the time, sometimes it happens, > as I can see in the server log).

For that, you can sue your provider, and you'll probably win the case,
but will there be anything for him to pay you with?  If it's limited
liability company in bankruptcy, game over, you lose.  You're unlikely
to recover legal costs.  There's no way you can blame the reseller for
this; he probably *legally* is not allowed to contact you, because
that would be a threat against his actual customer, your provider.
I am afraid there is nothing to pay me. And now that the domain-offensive said they will contact their customers in future I am also not so mad anymore at them. But still I think things like this are not supposed to be legal. And there is a good reason why the Denic handles things differently.
I think the reseller
is price-gouging, no matter how nice he seems;
This was my failed attempt in indirect speech. I did not think he was nice until the last two mails where he promised to change their handling of end customers.
you should not have to
pay an exorbitant "restoration fee" since you were not the customer in
arrears -- you are a new customer.  In fact, the charge for a single
domain from the reseller is probably much higher than what you were
paying, but you may be able to avoid that because the reseller
explicitly split his invoice into a "restoration fee" which is bogus,
and the original rental fee, which is probably way lower than he would
charge to a new customer (but that's his problem, not yours).

It seems that there is a fee involved for restoring the domain, the Cronon AG wanted 47,40 Euro. The domain-offensive.de wanted around 80. I managed to get them down to 47,40 plus tax, that could be what they have to pay to the Cronon AG. Not sure about the tax. The fee for the domain is their usual fee. Still I am paying for things my friends did wrong. They owe me much more money than this and I doubt I will ever see it again.

So probably I will sue nobody and just have lost time, money and google ranking and gained some insights in domain rights (shiver). But maybe I should post this case in the internic complaint form (http://reports.internic.net/cgi/registrars/problem-report.cgi), maybe they will correct this.

By the way, if I understand the following part from the registrars agreement (http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm) correctly shouldn't the domain-offensive be listed somewhere?

3.7.7.3 Any Registered Name Holder that intends to license use of a domain name to a third party is nonetheless the Registered Name Holder of record and is responsible for providing its own full contact information and for providing and updating accurate technical and administrative contact information adequate to facilitate timely resolution of any problems that arise in connection with the Registered Name.
Confused ...

Thanks a lot for your replys, Uli


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links