Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:57:03 +0900
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi <sotarokob@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- References: <0358f886870fc884ffca8f93db947930@example.com> <4A77CB0F.3010800@example.com> <4A77F8CB.2000906@example.com> <4A77FC7F.6020008@example.com> <4A780553.3060303@example.com> <4A7808C8.5010705@example.com> <4A780D8F.6020504@example.com> <4A783D16.4060605@example.com> <4A78F7E1.6090101@example.com> <4A790441.4070605@example.com>
- Organization: SUMTEC Inc.
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
Yes, I agree now.When I joined a Mr. Richard Stallman - rms' s open lecture at conference with several distribution of Novel, RH, Debian,Mandriva sevaral years ago,I unfortunately could not hear his opinion about the situation. If we could have an opportunity to meet him, we really want to hear his opinion and GNU / GPL policy about this. Sotaro Edward Middleton wrote:Sotaro Kobayashi wrote:Edward Middleton wrote:| Not all distributions support ARM but most of the important ones do.Yes, I am scared about this point. For me,the situation which not all importamt distributions are supporting ARM seems to infringe "The right to write software unimpeded by private monopolies" in GNL.Without considering hardware architecture neutrality in writing the program under GNL,it seems to me that we need to stop using Linux on that hardware. :-(I think you have got it the wrong way round. SuSE and Mandriva decided, unilaterally, holding private monopolies over their respective distributions, to not support the arm architecture. That is their right. That is not to say that someone couldn't port OpenSuSE or Mandriva to arm but that Novel and Mandriva aren't going to do it for you. That doesn't stop a developer from writing applications that run on both SuSE, Mandriva and any other distributions and architectures. I would argue that, it improves the likelihood that developers will write portable code by making architecture specific assumptions obvious. If you we were talking about porting applications to arm assembler I could see your point but the big advantage of using Linux is that most applications don't need porting, they just need to be recompiler. That is the reason so many distributions supported arm so easily. Edward-- -------------------------------------------------- ÉTÉÄÉeÉbÉN(óL) LinuxÉ\ÉäÉÖÅ[ÉVÉáÉìéñã∆ïî è¨ó—Å@example.com Åß338-8570 çÈã åßÇ≥Ç¢ÇΩÇ‹ésç˜ãÊâ∫ëÂãvï€255 çÈã ëÂäw ínàÊÉIÅ[ÉvÉìÉCÉmÉxÅ[ÉVÉáÉìÉZÉìÉ^Å[ì‡ TEL&FAX: 048-856-1546 E-mail: sotarokob@example.com URL : http://www.sumtec.biz --------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Niels Kobschätzki
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Pietro Zuco
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Sotaro Kobayashi
- Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- From: Edward Middleton
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Trying to compare settings of two different PHP servers
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Zurus distributions experience
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links