Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:39:23 +0900
- From: Kenneth Burling <burlingk@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- References: <5634e9210907141717r18873031s7dfc4dd216c708a5@example.com> <877hyak75b.fsf@example.com> <4A5D556F.2050605@example.com> <873a8yjvhd.fsf@example.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull<stephen@example.com> wrote: > Edward Middleton writes: > > Been there, done that, and no, git is not clearly the best tool for > that. Git is the best tool for managing a highly dynamic project IMO, > but among the distributed tools (specifically git, hg, bzr, and darcs) > Darcs has arguably the best UI for merging existing treess because it > has a builtin diff editor. (Of course you could use Emacs diff-mode, > but Darcs is probably the user-friendliest.) > I personally like darcs. Are there any open source collaboration sites that use it? I have seen plenty that use svn and CVS. A few even use git. Concept wise, and user interface wise, darcs is the one that makes the most sense to me! :-)
- References:
- [tlug] Open-source repository question
- From: Jim Breen
- [tlug] Open-source repository question
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- From: Edward Middleton
- Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Open-source repository question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links