Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Long-term Stability Distros (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:54:26 +0900
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Long-term Stability Distros (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- References: <5634e9210903112233k1a4ac6a8x27586da1cedc8853@mail.gmail.com> <1236842377.18591.1304983173@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5634e9210903121722h2a99e25cq7e79853af991258b@mail.gmail.com> <20090312233815.07d0ef72.jep200404@columbus.rr.com> <20090313041311.GA83135@mail.scottro.net>
2009/3/13 Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:38:15PM -0400, jep200404 wrote: > >> If you are going to RHEL/Centos now, you would install >> RHEL/Centos 5, and have about another five years of support. > > RH has already released. CentOS is coming quite soon, possibly a week or > two. 5.3 will have several good changes, noticeably in hardware > support 5.3 also supports encrypted filesystems in the installer and suspend to RAM and to disk, making it the best RHEL yet for laptops (I am one of the owners of Amazon's developer laptop image, FWIW). -- Cheers, Josh
- References:
- [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: David J Iannucci
- Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- From: Jim Breen
- Long-term Stability Distros (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- From: jep200404
- Re: Long-term Stability Distros (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- From: Scott Robbins
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2
- Next by Date: [tlug] Re: Mysterious LVM issue
- Previous by thread: Re: Long-term Stability Distros: RHEL/Centos 5 versus 6 (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Next by thread: Re: Long-term Stability Distros (was Re: [tlug] Flash and Firexfox 2)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links