Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:54:39 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- References: <87abeh2968.fsf@xemacs.org> <78d7dd350809082230l2f121301mf9c5806e73e682a4@mail.gmail.com> <874p4p25dn.fsf@xemacs.org> <78d7dd350809090136v223d67d5g232f5239dea75af@mail.gmail.com> <871vzt20jr.fsf@xemacs.org> <20080909103739.GN17711@lucky.cynic.net> <87iqt3zbt3.fsf@xemacs.org>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-09-11 10:55 +0900 (Thu), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Curt Sampson writes: > > > This is why we (at Starling) don't generally use system-default > > configuration files or startup scripts for this sort of stuff. Let QAM > > manage all of your configuration and server start/stop stuff, and these > > problems go away. > > Nonsense. Sometimes configs should be updated, and it's very helpful > for the vendor to offer to do that. Right. Ideally, of course, it's whomever made the software, and they simply change or add a default setting, and your config files keep working fine. > Since QAM is not a vendor, it can't provide that help.... I don't see why we are any less unable than Debian to "provide that help" for Apache software. In fact, we're probably more able, since we at least leave you with the vendors defaults, rather than making up our own and changing them on you without notice. > I have to go find out what TRT is myself. QAM might be a better way > for *vendors* to manage these things, but I don't use QAM so I can't > judge that. I'm not sure who you think a "vendor" is, but QAM is designed for the guy at the pointy end who's actually deploying and running a server. > As I mentioned, Gentoo does this right (without the aid of QAM AFAIK > ;-). It took me about 15 minutes to work through 150 conffiles > updates when I got back from California and updated my system to > current. Riiiight.. Anybody who thinks that spending time working through config files during an upgrade is a good thing doesn't manage many systems, I'll tell you that. What you do works for you, with only a couple of machines and a handful of applications to manage. Try it with a couple of dozen production applications on top of all the usual stuff (mail and so on) and a couple of dozen servers running all of these. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Windows Is Free For Business
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Firefox 3.0.1 doesn't respect <meta http-equiv="content-type">
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links