Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:16:12 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- References: <c0f4e2b00806140549r1b18f3c1mc38c83fe02614d17@mail.gmail.com> <20080614140131.GC11395@lucky.cynic.net> <87r6azitbm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <c0f4e2b00806141800v3ab02fbbs1fc0677490e71878@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-06-15 10:00 +0900 (Sun), Bruno Raoult wrote: > Sorry, I was not clear enough. My network looks like: > > TERA -----ethernet----eth0--Linux PC-rausb0----wifi-----lan (including > internet router) And is this Linux box bridging the two physical networks (Ethernet and WiFi), or are these two separate IP networks between which it is (or could be) routing? > My two interfaces have the "multicast" flag. I'm not even sure what that means, but it may not be sufficient to ensure the packets are seen and routed. > This is where I am puzzled. I don't know anything about multicast, but if > you are right, I should see those "invitation" packets from client at > first, right? > > But I don't see any, and, worse, the multicast packets coming from the > TERA don't appear too on the rausb0 side. As if my forwarding rule > would not work for those (when I ftp from the lan to the TERA, I can > see the packets in both sides, if you wonder if the sniffer works or > not). I'm not clear on what your "forwarding rule" is, but if it's NAT, you probably want to disable that entirely. If you've got a firewall, you probably want to disable that (i.e., pass through all packets) as well unless there are folks you don't trust on one or the other networks. (Your Internet router should do any firewalling required for that.) If you bridge, at that point you're set; stuff will just work. (Unless your bridge is broken, and not forwarding non-broadcast Ethernet packets with the multicast bit set.) If you route, your router is responsible for routing multicast as necessary. This means, first, that it should never forward packets or accept subscriptions for things destined to 224.0.0.0/24, since that's reserved for multicast on a single network only. Second, if a host on the WiFi side wants to see multicast from the ethernet side (or any multicast at all, really, even locally), it needs to send an IGMP subscription message to that multicast address. Your router should see this and start forwarding the multicast packets. If you're still having difficulty, probably the first thing to do would be to explain what device you have on the WiFi side that understands a multicast protocol, which protocol it is, and how you've configured it to subscribe. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- References:
- [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- From: Bruno Raoult
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] RMS is at it again
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [Was: iptables] Forward multicats
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links