Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:26:34 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- References: <78d7dd350805282131u46509543p8138803c87301664@mail.gmail.com> <78d7dd350805282056s4e60e79bx160588dea86f0f8a@mail.gmail.com> <20080529163026.GE13977@lucky.cynic.net> <78d7dd350805291911x31fda243u595d9a127397ac51@mail.gmail.com> <20080530104356.U20566@isris.pair.com> <87ve0veanw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080530190920.P20566@isris.pair.com> <87iqwseaob.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080602050632.GC14810@lucky.cynic.net> <87d4n0e266.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On 2008-06-02 16:17 +0900 (Mon), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Could you describe the failure mode? Yes. I see no replies whatsoever except from the final hop. > My brain is AWOL and I'm not seeing how it would fail ... I'm guessing that it's a cheap NAT algoritm that's not properly associating the ICMP TTL expired messages with the host that triggered them, and is chucking them rather than passing them back. At some point I can put a sniffer on the other side of my office router and see if that's really what's happening, I suppose. > OTOH, the next version (current is 1.4, next is 1.5) of tcptraceroute > apparently has some feature related to NAT. Ah, dnat: New --dnat, --no-dnat (default), and --no-dnat-strict command line arguments. --dnat enabled Destination NAT detection, which works by comparing the quoted IP address in an ICMP payload with the destination a probe packet was addressed to. So perhaps it's confused by the fact that the fragment within the ICMP response isn't being translated, and has not the computer's address, but the address of the router. cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] VirtualBox Capabilities
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] B Flets blocks port 25?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links