Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:00:26 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- References: <47FE430E.3050608@imaginatorium.org> <20080410172229.GC14183@mail.scottro.net> <87lk3lh5ky.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20080410213357.GA15843@mail.scottro.net> <20080417054309.GB428@lucky.cynic.net> <d8fcc0800804170305w10e06c1exf449d971a6f1c390@mail.gmail.com> <20080417233520.GB7858@pragmatic.cynic.net> <d8fcc0800804171949x15a2c2fdy82c49eb36835e646@mail.gmail.com>
Josh Glover writes: > Yes, I do. I consider turning off ICMP a good tradeoff, because being > able to ping But ICMP isn't just ping. Since 2001 or so things have been a lot better, but up to that point I had a lot of trouble with some sites that wanted weird MTU, or with tunnelled protocols, etc. IMO if you're going to firewall ICMP, you really ought to only pass stuff through application gateways and proxies. No direct connects between inside and outside at all....
- References:
- [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Brian Chandler
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] OT - Shutdown day
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Ping vs www server
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links