Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 21:21:38 -0700
- From: "Keith Bawden" <keith@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- References: <d8fcc0800708082039q566e6238lc9937d526e21882@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/8/07, Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> wrote: > Trimming example; you know what to do. > > On 8/8/07, Edward Middleton <emiddleton@example.com> wrote: > > [RFC] Which [IME] does everyone use > XXX # SNIP > > [Q] Fixing [EMACS] cperl-mode > > [FYI][HW] giveaway > XXX > > [Q] two [SSH] server on one IP > > Sorry mate, plain ugly and too complex is still my vote. [...] I don't agree with your appraisal that this is not trimmed enough. I left in the ugly complex examples to provide the _exact_ context I wanted for my comment. I agree that trimming should be *encouraged* but I also find trimming can be subjective. That is an author will leave in what they *think* is needed to provide the appropriate context for their responses. I /dev/nulled one list member for repeatedly harassing me off list on this exact point. Anyway, I'm a fan of list policies and enforcing them when need be. However, I do not want to see our list become a draconian State. Regards, Keith
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!: Not! and Don't Break Threads!
- From: jep200404
- References:
- [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [RFC] Proposed method for TAGGING subjects
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] [OT] Linux users voting (was: Linux breeding out Microsoft)
- Previous by thread: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [ADMIN] Trim!
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links