RE: [tlug] Suggestions for splitting of mails?

[<burlingk@example.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tlug-bounces@example.com [mailto:tlug-bounces@example.com On 
> Behalf Of emiddleton@example.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:46 PM
> To: tlug@example.com
> Subject: Re: [tlug] Suggestions for splitting of mails?
> 
<snip> 
> 
> You tend to when you ask a deep question and get given the 
> obvious superficial answer by dozens of people.  [EXPERT] or 
> some variation would indicate you were after more then just 
> the obvious. [NOOB] would indicate you might need the obvious 
> explained to you.
>
Anything where you might start the question, "I know this might be stupid, but...."

:P


> >  > > [IM],
> >
> > "Instant Messaging"?  "FEP" or "HENKAN" is probably less ambiguous.
> >   
> 
> Yes it is a bit ambiguous, [HENKAN] might be best.
> 

FEP, Henkan?  korehanandesuka?


> >  > > [RUBY], [PYTHON], [PERL],
> >
> > "P-CODE".
> As a superset?, but it would probably be better to be able 
> specify the language as well.  People answering perl 
> questions aren't necessarily going to be able to answer 
> python questions.
>

Just because they are all scripting languages, doesn't
mean they are all the same.  :P