RE: [tlug] [OT] Good IT Resume

[<burlingk@example.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Glover
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 3:40 PM
> 
> Well, this is another very good reason why people should not 
> break backwards compatibility unless absolutely necessary.
Quite often, I think that is the key to dependency hell.
Backwards compatability should not be broken.
:-)
But sometimes it is. ^^;;
:(
 


> > I am not saying that monolythic code blocks are the way
> > to go.  I am simply saying that splitting everything into 
> blocks and 
> > divying the blocks out is not the "Easy Way," or even the 
> "Better Way" 
> > in all cases. ^^;
> 
> No, it is the Only Way, unless, like Curt, you own a company 
> that is small enough that you can treat the code as one 
> block. But even then, if you want to use other code, you have 
> to learn to play with modular code.
> 
Modular good. :)
Wording my previous post was hard because I am supportive
of multiple models, and I was trying not to say that either
model was "The" model. :-)

I would like to learn how to propperly create libs. ^_^