Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:01:13 +0900
- From: Edward Wright <edw@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- References: <14178ED3A898524FB036966D696494FB138EFE@messenger.cv63.navy.mil> <d8fcc0800707080203q41027676h21e8555e571eb7df@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 06:03:29PM +0900, Josh Glover wrote: > On 08/07/07, burlingk@example.com <burlingk@example.com> wrote: > >That is why Debian and BSD are so stable. > > Well, BSD makes Debian look like Windows NT 3.0 in terms of stability. Oh, c'mon.... Ain't no comparison that will make any linux look like NT 3.0 in terms of stability or anything else... > After all, Debian is running the Linux kernel, which even in the > stable branch has a lot more experimental code But Debian stable is not likely to be running the latest "stable" kernel release. I don't have hands on experience to compare Debian stable to BSD, but Debian is extremely conservative in what they let into "stable". Ed
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- From: burlingk
- Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Solaris to copy Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [OT] Intel core duo errata
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links