Re: argc loop [tlug]

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>]

Jim writes:

 > When argc is zero, the former code "does nothing gracefully", 

Which is the point; it doesn't matter how gracefully you persist in
misunderstanding the spec, you still get fired.

 > while the latter code requires another test inside the loop 
 > to avoid dereferencing a null pointer. 

Not in my environment (PPC Mac OS X 10.4.9).