
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] Re: font encoding question
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:10:33 +0900
- From: <burlingk@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Re: font encoding question
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:27:41 +0900
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
> Subject: [tlug] RE: Tlug Digest, Vol 18, Issue 36
> To: Tokyo Linux Users Group <tlug@example.com>
> Message-ID: <87645lbrb6.fsf@example.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> burlingk@example.com writes:
>
> > I would like to see everything move to UTF-8, or even some newer
> > standard that allows for more characters.
>
> What is insufficiently inclusive about "universal"?
I had read somewhere that if you tried to use Chinese, Japanese,
and Korean together, that sometimes UTF-8 ran into issues.
I could be wrong though, because it was something seen on a mailing
list, and not an actual specification page. ^^;
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index