Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][tlug] "strange antipathy towards Unicode" . . . . . . . . (was: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages)
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:52:53 -0500
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] "strange antipathy towards Unicode" . . . . . . . . (was: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages)
- References: <45AAFDA9.90504@example.com> <20070115091710.465a8f0b.jep200404@example.com> <op.tl694ax0p3esx5@example.com> <78d7dd350701151659n104a93e3v6cd6cb936f4459ed@example.com> <20070115212859.0251adf4.jep200404@example.com> <157AA731-9AC1-4FEF-ABAD-23A5BE8F0C05@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0701161628390.12325@example.com> <78d7dd350701160014h40155a75n345183640cbccfc5@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0701161825530.14637@example.com>
Curt Sampson wrote: > ... Japanese software tends to be worse at language processing > than other systems [because] the Japanese tend to have this > strange antipathy towards Unicode. Here's toward understanding the issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_unification which I understand as meaning that there shouldn't be any problem with Japanese _only_ text, even mixing kanji, hiragana, and katakana. My understanding is that the problem occurs when one mixes Chinese characters from different CJK languages in olain text Unicode. Most folks don't read things with mixed CJK language Chinese characters, so Unicode should not be a problem for most folks. The problem is for folks who need to mix Chinese characters from multiple CJK languages in a single plain text Unicode document. I guess there would also be a problem supporting multiple CJK languages on a single system, even when each plain text Unicode document is in a single CJK language, because one would have to choose which language to view each document in. The antipathy might not be by just the Japanese, and it might not be so strange.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Dave M G
- Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language (was Re: [tlug] What is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Jim
- [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Greg Thomson
- Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
- Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Jim
- Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Jean-Christophe Helary
- Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Nguyen Vu Hung
- Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- From: Curt Sampson
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Next by Date: [tlug] Tech meeting videos
- Previous by thread: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages . . . . . . . (was: Re: [tlug] Re: Bourne Shell is the most appropriate scripting language)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] "strange antipathy towards Unicode" . . . . . . . . (was: Re: Learn a Variety of Languages)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links