Re: [tlug] Email address munging in the TLUG archives

[Edward Middleton <edward@example.com>]

Joe Larabell wrote:
>> In deference to those who have gone before (and whose addresses are
>> still good), and are not on the list to express their willingness to
>> recieve unsolicited <g> email from all over the globe, and not seeing
>> the point of providing email addresses to the world at large, I think
>> it would be best not to make email addresses decipherable at all.
>>     
>
> I agree. The addresses should be obfuscated beyond repair. It's unlikely
> anyone could come up with a munging algorithm that legit users of varying
> technical prowess could easily decipher that would also block spammers.
>   

I totally agree, If you really want to put your details an an easily
accessible location put it on your wiki page and link to it in your footer.

Edward