Re: [tlug] Email address munging in the TLUG archives

[Jim <jep200404@example.com>]

Josh Glover wrote:

> We basically need to decide if we want people to be able to decipher
> email addresses or not. 

Yup.

> ... a Javascript text hack. 

I typically think of Javascript as being executed on the client. 
Does you mean that actual address would be sent unobfuscated, 
then munged in client by Javascript? I hope all the mungification 
would be done on the server. 

> If not, I think we should simply replace everything in the
> address after the @ sign, e.g. your address becomes: Jim
> <jep200404@example.com>

Makes me think of pig latin. ep200404-jay@example.com
or Elmer Fudd http://www.google.com/intl/xx-elmer/ or Baba Wawa. 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=xx-elmer&q=barbara+walters+baba+wawa