Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 14:21:28 +0900
- From: "Mauro Sauco" <sauco@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- References: <op.tinh4yeop3esx5@example.com> <op.tinjury1p3esx5@example.com> <20061107172452.ec3c4658.godwin.stewart@example.com> <op.tinrdawep3esx5@example.com> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0611071726420.76762@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On 2006/11/07@??:33, <Joe Larabell> wrote: > > > > I think you'l find that the whole concept of an X server on Windows has > > > been around for much longer than that but I could be wrong. > > > > > Errr.. You're right. Blush, blush. Upon futher reading this concept is > > nothing new at all. > > AFAIK, the X protocol itself is fairly bloated and somewhat insecure. For > remote connections (remote as in not on the same LAN), there is a better > solution that's been around quite a while: To say that X is insecure and suggest that VNC is a better solution I think it is no a good idea :) (of course VNC can be tunneled through ssh but so can X) The best solution is not to use GUIs at all (after all why would you need it?) :-) //mauro//
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Joe Larabell
- References:
- [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Greg Thomson
- Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Greg Thomson
- Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Greg Thomson
- Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- From: Joe Larabell
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: (was Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Gentoo initscripts - depend function
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Xming - COOL!
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links