Re: [tlug] SCIM Survey Results

[Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:41:58AM -0500, Jim wrote:
> Fedora held a survey about SCIM in November. 
> Why would Fedora hold such a survey? 
> My guess is that with Fedora as the beta for RHEL, 
> scim is under review to replace the incumbant IME 
> not only for Fedora, but also for RHEL (and hence Centos). 


At present, I think their default is still kinput2 and canna--if one
chooses Japanese support during installation, at least as of a few weeks
ago, they installed canna.

However, yum has scim, anthy and scim-anthy available, at least since
FC4.  (Not all of the offshoots have it yet though, apparently, e.g.
Blag.)

NetBSD now has anthy and uim, though if you don't know how to use
PKG_OPTIONS, it'll also install canna.  :)  I guess the venerable
kinput2 -canna combo is gradually passing away. 


- -- 

Scott

GPG KeyID EB3467D6
( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2  A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Angel: Buffy.
Buffy: Angel.
Xander: Xander.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDxR7Z+lTVdes0Z9YRApHiAJ4xuRf4jtOEVl+oujE4N7Wdzp4UcACfcAhy
2/nfAAgrx7Acd92npy/8p0w=
=WJzT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----