TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive

tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem

Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:01:16 +0900

From: Uva Coder <uva.coder@example.com>

Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem

References: <32a656c20502280445275ca503@example.com> <d8fcc08005022811218614614@example.com> <871xaz94k5.fsf@example.com> <d8fcc0800503011005545dc291@example.com> <32a656c205030118126f700053@example.com> <42266C11.6010702@example.com> <32a656c205030219342a033e4e@example.com> <20050303050934.GV28606@example.com> <32a656c205030223262cc05382@example.com> <d8fcc0800503030451138859ac@example.com>
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:51:55 -0500, Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> wrote:

> Obviously not, or there would be no need for Inferno, right? ;)

Inferno's target was/is embedded systems. Plan 9's target is everything else. 

-uva
Follow-Ups:

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Josh Glover

References:

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Josh Glover

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Stephen J. Turnbull

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Josh Glover

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Uva Coder

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: simon colston

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Uva Coder

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Martin Bähr

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Uva Coder

Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem
From: Josh Glover

Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] filesystem namespaces

Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem

Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem

Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Alan Cox's remark at Fosdem

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links