Re: [tlug] Re: Fwd: Re: Suse blues-progress?

[paul arenson <paul@example.com>]

On Tuesday 09 March 2004 08:27, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> paul arenson wrote:
> > Here is what I get for the first one you suggested
> s to be an error?
>
> Yes.  It seems you don't have cannakill.  'bash' (bourne again shell) is
> the name of your commandline interpreter, comparable to command.com in DOS,
> but much more powerful.
>
> It also looks like either your cannaserver behaves differently than mine
> or you mistyped the command.  It shouldn't print usage info.
> Hmm.  Your SuSE may use a version of canna quite different from the one
> in Debian.  Please use "rpm -q -a | grep canna", this should print all
> packet names (including the version) matching 'canna' from the rpm packet
> database.  It should look like canna-3.7-4 or cannaserver-3.7-4 or
> similar.  In this example 3.7 would be the software version and 4 is the
> revision of the package.  (Incidentally this is the version of canna I
> am using)
> You are using SuSE 9.0, right?

Yes....


arenson@example.com:~> rpm -q -a | grep canna
cannadic-0.95-30
canna-3.6p3-20
canna-libs-3.6p3-20
nvi-m17n-canna-1.79_19991117-600
canna-yubin-0.0.20011101-217
arenson@example.com:~>



paul
>