Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:54:46 +0100
- From: Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- References: <20040229010646.GI18439@example.com><opr3306nqe0fabl5@example.com><20040229031050.GL18439@example.com><20040229034123.GA8022@example.com><20040229035907.GO18439@example.com><20040229040529.GA8200@example.com><20040229041909.GP18439@example.com><20040229101040.30f576d2.gstewart@example.com><20040229094811.GZ18439@example.com><20040229105453.3cafef42.gstewart@example.com><20040229105920.GB18439@example.com>
- Organization: Nope, none here, it's a mess ;o)
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:59:20 -0800, Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com> wrote: > I just checked, it was 0.9.7-2 (the -2 presumably being Debian-specific). Knowing Debian I'm surprised it's anything more recent than 0.6.0 :o) This said, I believe that the improvements to the IMAP code were made with 0.9.8 so you might want to give it a shot just for S&G. I'm compiling 0.9.10 now, which was released only a few hours ago. -- G. Stewart -- gstewart@example.com -- gstewart@example.com Registered Linux user #284683 (Slackware 9.0, Linux 2.4.25) -------------------------------------------------------------- There are only 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Attachment:
pgp00001.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Who do you recommend for Business Desktop?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- Previous by thread: RE: [tlug] Who do you recommend for Business Desktop?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] How revolutionary is M2?
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |