[tlug] How revolutionary is M2?

[Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>]

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:58:08AM +0900, Shawn wrote:

>Happily using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: 
>http://www.opera.com/m2/

Just curious, if you pay for it, does this commercial go away?  Is it
revolutionary enough to be worth paying for, or just revolutionary?

I haven't noticed anyone using M2 before (at least, not that had
the M2 .signature), but there must be something about it that drew
you away from [fF]ree mail clients such as Kmail, mutt, Balsa, Sylpheed,
Evolution, etc.  What are the strengths of M2 compared to any/all
of those which led you to choose it?

Or do you just use it because it's the default in Opera? :-)

Jonathan
-- 
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys ACC46EF9
Key fingerprint = E52E 8153 8F37 74AF C04D  0714 364F 540E ACC4 6EF9
"99 pounds of natural-born goodness, 99 pounds of soul!"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature