Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:24:50 -0500
- From: Scott <scottro@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- References: <8DCC4FF2-474A-11D8-9CC6-000393D21E3A@example.com> <20040115163950.GR22349@example.com> <20040116095743.B575.B-ROBSON@example.com> <20040116062719.GZ22349@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:27:19PM -0800, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:09:53AM +0900, Brett Robson wrote: > > >Until you get to version 9. There seems to be very few packages that go > >to double digit versions. Count the number of version 10s you see, they > >are very rare and you can be sure they are from "serious" suppliers. > > Slackware is at 10, I think (OK, they are serious) and Mandrake has a > 10 coming up (clowns) and SuSE should have a 10 at some point (serious). > Of course, those are whole distros, but your point is well-taken: not > much has been around long enough to have a version 10, and those that > have are generally legit: they have nine previous major releases to get > to 10. Actually, Slack had a major version bump at some point, but it was pretty lighthearted--I think they upped from 3 or 4 to 7 and Patrick just said, hey, everyone else is at 7 so why not? As I said, it was fairly lightheartedly done, and not really meant to impress anyone--at least that was the impression I got. > mindshare hit when they decided to abandon the free (as in beer) version > of RH entirely and replace it with Fedora, which will always be kind of > a hacker's Linux, I suspect. People who don't want to hack around with > their distro but just want to use it to get work done will mostly steer > clear of Fedora. Having played with it, albeit briefly, not sure if that's the case--when you say hacker's distro, I think more of something like Slack. Fedora pretty much "just works," in the same way RH does, though, of course as a beta, it's a bit buggy. I would be leery about putting it on a production server (he writes, using FreeBSD 5.1 on a non-critical server at work for fun) but for the home user, it's probably close to the later RH versions (8, 9). So, I think if I were still very used to RH, and using it as workstation, I would switch to Fedora and not notice much difference. By this I mean, web surfing, email, Office type docs, etc. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: Cool! Crossbow! Check out these babies. Goodbye stakes, hello flying fatality.Attachment: pgp00067.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- From: Raymond Regalado
- Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- From: Brett Robson
- Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- Next by Date: [tlug] tlug-digest Digest V2004 #16
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] RE: getting back on track [ was RE: introductions ]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links