Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: Absurd DNS failures
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:46:12 +0900
- From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: Absurd DNS failures
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307081841040.24934-100000@example.com>
"J. David Beutel" <jdb@example.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Norman Diamond wrote: > > > > > > How could this get success for www.asia.microsoft.com but timeouts for > > > plain microsoft.com? > > > > Different packet length? I'd see if different MTU settings have any > > effect. (But sorry, offhand I don't know how to do that.) > > P.S. See http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerade-HOWTO/mtu-issues.html Even though my situation has nothing to do with masquerading (it is a single machine dialling up directly through a modem), this turned out to be relevant. But first a digression. The cited page is confusing as to whether the most frequently suitable setting would be 1492 or 1460 or 1412, and actually the cited page is worse than that. When masquerading is involved, the page says that the machine which is connected MUST have MTU of 1500, but also says that the MTU is limited to at most 1492 if the connection is PPPoE, and also says that some ISPs have quirks which limit the MTU to 1460. The MUST setting of 1500 seems to be MUST AND MUST NOT. Anyway, since masquerading isn't involved, I set both MTU and MRU 1500. And it worked. So where the Linux Network Administrators Guide (NAG) recommends an MTU and MRU of 296 for dialled PPP connections, the NAG seems to be pretty much out to lunch. SuSE's default was 1492. I'll bet it will work most of the time, though your cited TLUG page implies that there might be occasional failures (i.e. when the must and must not of 1500 is not actually set, there will still be occasional servers that will not cooperate with 1492 or whatever). So when I obeyed the NAG and changed it from 1492 to 296, it failed more frequently. I wonder if akadns.net filters out the type of incoming ICMP packet that tries to ask akadns.net to reduce its outgoing MTU for clients who have obeyed the NAG. If so, then akadns.net's replies will never reach those clients, and those clients will never be able to resolve the ordinary names of microsoft.com and yahoo.com.
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Re: Absurd DNS failures
- From: J. David Beutel
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Re: apache2 setup and japanese charset
- Next by Date: [tlug] Mojibake in kword and abiword
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: Absurd DNS failures
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Absurd DNS failures
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links