Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:45:37 -0700
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- References: <200306191907.32431.michael-engel@example.com> <E19SwWb-0005GZ-I4@example.com> <20030619210129.GE22501@example.com> <20030620.093935.74752425.acmuller@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:39:35AM +0900, Charles Muller wrote: >I don't know in what sense Jonathan means that NTFS is much better than FAT >32 WRT performance, I don't know whether NTFS is faster or slower than FAT32, but you may have noticed that if you have unscheduled downtime (on Windows! Never! I can't believe it! :-) that a system with NTFS just picks up where you left off, whereas a FAT system has to do the Windows equivalent of an fsck to verify filesystem integrity. This is because NTFS is a journaling filesystem. NTFS is fairly reliable, a pretty important thing when the OS isn't :-) JonathanAttachment: pgp00026.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] Re: dualboot WinXP/Linux
- From: Tobias Diedrich
- References:
- [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- From: Michael Klaus Engel
- Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- From: acmuller
- Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- From: Jonathan Q
- Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- From: Charles Muller
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] dualboot WinXP/Linux
- Next by thread: [tlug] Re: dualboot WinXP/Linux
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links