Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:11:01 +0100
- From: Martin Baehr <mbaehr@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- References: <AD619442E69BDE43A91704CC81B6330C0CFE04@example.com> <20021216163740.0534010f.gstewart@example.com> <20021217053543.GA5813@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:35:43PM +0900, Mauro Sauco wrote: > > Italian is also much closer to French than it is to Spanish. > Not true, at least from my perspective .. as a Spanish speaker I do understand Italian a lot more than French. so, where is the problem? you are both saying that you understand italian better, which makes a lot of sense because of all the languages italian should be a lot closer to latin. the two comparisons are unrelated: 1. it-fr < sp-fr 2. it-sp < sp-fr as a graph: fr -------- sp \ / \ / \ / it there is no contradiction. both can be true. greetings, martin. -- interested in doing pike programming, sTeam/caudium/pike/roxen training, sTeam/caudium/roxen and/or unix system administration anywhere in the world. -- pike programmer working in europe csl-gmbh.net open-steam.org (www.archlab|(www|db).hb2).tuwien.ac.at unix bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).at systemadministrator (stuts|black.linux-m68k).org is.(schon.org|root.at) Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
- References:
- [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- From: Jim BLACKSON
- Re: [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- From: Mauro Sauco
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Pasokon Koubou
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Pasokon Koubou
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] RE: OT: Latin
- Next by thread: [tlug] Japanese emacs
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links