Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [OT]: PHP/MySQL: Japanese input/ouput prgramming advice docs sought
- Date: 05 Jul 2002 14:12:05 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [OT]: PHP/MySQL: Japanese input/ouput prgramming advice docs sought
- References: <F175p0HuVUHrGoBx4Pv00007b39@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Informed Management (RC2))
>>>>> "Jean-Christian" == Jean-Christian Imbeault <jean_christian@example.com> writes: >> Unless your app returns lots of data via cursors, it's >> preferable to sort client-side anyway. Jean-Christian> Is this comment specifically for Postgress? I Jean-Christian> always tought it was more efficient to get a DB to Jean-Christian> sort results than doing it programmatically. First, I'm not talking about efficiency. I'm thinking locale-specific issues; normally you will not be able to request a locale-specific sort from the DB, it will have a global locale. In particular this is true of Postgres as of the 7.0 betas (I haven't paid attention since). Maybe you don't need that today, but are you sure you won't tomorrow? Even for efficiency, it's the other way around, except for the important special case that the DB may be keeping things in order, already. (This happens as a side effect of indexing techniques such as binary search.) True, the DB will use a highly optimized general purpose sort routine, but you can probably do nearly as well, even in a scripting language (they all have efficient general sort routines in their libraries). However, you may have information that makes sorting a lot faster (eg, transform a large array of postal code strings to 7-place integers, then sort, then translate back---much faster than doing string comparisons). Furthermore, there are sorting jobs that the DB simply won't be able to do, such as 50-on-jun from kanji (of course, you can keep the yomi in the database, but what if you didn't?) Finally, there's an issue of cost. Clients are cheap, and typically spend most of their cycles on screen savers. Sort there if possible, especially if owned by someone else ;-). Webservers are moderately expensive, but costs scale linearly because web service distributes well over a farm of identical boxen. Database servers are even more expensive, and costs scale badly because to get 10x the power you need 10x the machine---general relational databases do not distribute well (although LDAP does). -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py
- References:
- Re: [tlug] [OT]: PHP/MySQL: Japanese input/ouput prgramming advice docs sought
- From: Jean-Christian Imbeault
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] cheap, reliable co-location?
- Previous by thread: RE: [tlug] [OT]: PHP/MySQL: Japanese input/ouput prgramming advice docs sought
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [OT]: PHP/MySQL: Japanese input/ouput prgramming advice docs sought
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links