Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] *BSD vs Linux for severs?
- Date: 01 May 2002 15:08:18 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] *BSD vs Linux for severs?
- References: <200205010535.g415Zis21711@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
>>>>> "wileyc" == Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com> writes: >> 2- Also I have as a general belief that *BSD is more stable >> than Linux, of course I have no data to back this up, but ... wileyc> This belief is well-founded. Linux frankly isn't wileyc> engineered very well, primarily due to the fact that wileyc> kernel development and userland development are decoupled. Huh? This is the case for most apps on any platform (except for "chikan" platforms which are always exposing themselves for perversity's sake). Most userland code talks only to libc, which is neither fish nor fowl, of course. This is The Way That God Planned It (but see the OT: Niven's Birthday thread on comp.lang.python re programming languages for Moties). It seems to me that (1) the BSD devel groups tend to have far tighter, smaller developer cores than Linux does, and thus the best programmers seem to do a couple of kernel subsystems as well as some of userland, raising the average quality of userland code, and (2) Linux delegates so much of its userland development to projects which substitute politicking for coding standards (a big advantage for the OS from the wrong side of the Bay). These aren't problems with the _idea_ of modularization, more that we don't know how to scale decentralized OSS development to something as big and hairy as Linux has become. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean by "decoupled". Isn't the real issue: wileyc> Good design and implementation == stablility. Major linux wileyc> kernel subsystems keep being rewritten from scratch (in wileyc> the stable series!), which is indicative of poor design wileyc> ... Or maybe just developers with an irresistable itch. But of course it doesn't matter _why_ the subsystems are being rewritten, the destabilization is the same. Scary, isn't it. I'm still running 2.2.x on all my machines. wileyc> ... I no longer believe that linux is the best-of-breed UNIX. Er, this seems to be an opinion from a back-issue, 1998 or so.... -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py
- References:
- Re: [tlug] *BSD vs Linux for severs?
- From: Christopher SEKIYA
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] PC-Card/PCMCIA-Card -> USB Port For FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] LinuxWorld Japan ?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] *BSD vs Linux for severs?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] *BSD vs Linux for severs?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links