Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- From: Michael Doughty <Doughty_Michael@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:08:23 +0900
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
- In-reply-to: <oQbAsC.A.CKH.Ug9u8@example.com>
- References: <200204160519.g3G5J0914910@example.com><oQbAsC.A.CKH.Ug9u8@example.com>
>> Somewhere around Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:48:10 +0900, A.Sajjad Zaidi wrote: > Im sending out "text/plain; charset=utf-8" and I can read my messages > ok. Can everyone read * 日本語 * properly? I can read it. The question is, why use UTF-8? If you imagine this will make you more universally readable, I think you will find that this is not true. As Jim and Tony said, iso-2022-jp is the accepted way of sending Japanese in the email body. And, if you are only sending Japanese and English, there is no reason I can think of to deviate from this. Michael
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- From: A.Sajjad Zaidi
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- From: Jim Breen
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] pcap
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Don't ban me (was Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Re: UTF-8 Terminal Emulators?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links