Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting

[Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>]

Oh yes it would cause some nastiness if you made the mistake between 
16, and 32 since one use 2 bytes to address clusters, and the other
uses 4 bytes. probably any changes you made would clobber other entries
in the FAT table.

--Matt
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:20:22PM -0800, Marlo Rocci wrote:
> The specific section refered to specifying settings for Vfat partitions.
> FAT=12/16/32.  They state this overrides the automatc fat type detection
> routine.  and they say "Use with caution!"  I wanted to make sure I DIDN'T
> have to use this parameter.  fortunately I didn't.  I suspect it would cause
> problems if you chose the wrong one.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Q" <jq@example.com>
> To: <tlug@example.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [tlug] disk configuration: drive mounting
> 
> 
> > BOTi (9915104t@example.com) wrote:
> >
> > > I mean, most free software out there comes with a disclaimer like "This
> > > software comes without warranty of any kind, use at your own risk".
> >
> > So does most proprietary software - they call it a standard shrinkwrap
> > license.  Can you imagine if cars were sold that way? :-)
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> 

-- 
"Take away them collisions and the common channel and it's like Christianity 
 without Christ." -Jim Breen (speaking about "full-duplex" Ethernet)