Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- From: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:49:56 +0900
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <3C55FF80.C38AA3C9@example.com>; from Jack.Morgan@example.com on Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:48:48AM +0900
- Mail-followup-to: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- References: <3C55FF80.C38AA3C9@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.4i-jp0
It depends on what port. I'm not even 100% sure that they have even gotten it 100% straitened out in the i386 port. I would suggest keeping a small partition set aside for boot. RAID frame is already a handful enough without trying to get the boot block working correctly. Besides, you really don't want to RAID the swap space anyway, and at that point there is a compelling reason not to seperate off the boot partition also. --Matt On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:48:48AM +0900, Jack Morgan wrote: > I want to set up raidframe and have looked at some of the docs. > I can't figure out if I need a separate /boot partition that isn't > on the raid or not? This would be raid 1+0 (mirror and striping) > > If anyone has had experience with this, I appreciate hearing > about it. > > Thanks, > jack_morgan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- From: Jack Morgan
- References:
- [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- From: Jack Morgan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Re: up2date but no copy/paste
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- Previous by thread: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] raidframe on NetBSD
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links