Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: kill(2)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: kill(2)
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:24:44 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <15164.20030.851591.339125@example.com>
- References: <3B3AF05A.32388.001@example.com><m24rt0aqg5.fsf@example.com><00a601c10054$070d0070$0f01a8c0@example.com><15164.16623.858873.974051@example.com><m2bsn7abge.fsf@example.com><15164.20030.851591.339125@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <cxA21.A.lU.wDIP7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull@example.com> writes: >>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve@example.com> writes: sb> Come on Steve, writing a Unix device driver is _fun_, not sb> self-abuse. Self-abuse is more along the lines of debugging sb> someone else's perl script, coding in DCL or Intel assembly, sb> etc. :-) SJT> I was referring to the "beat me, whip me' semantics. Well if I were going down SBaur's list in trying to convince my employer I would skip the item with shared memory and would do my best to prove that writing the driver was the easiest solution. It'd be "beat them, whip them" :) Viktor P.S. I'm not. I like my employer :)
- References:
- Re: kill(2)
- From: vp@example.com (Viktor Pavlenko)
- Re: kill(2)
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Almost there
- Next by Date: Re: Q.
- Prev by thread: Re: kill(2)
- Next by thread: Re: kill(2)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links