Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kill(2)
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: kill(2)
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:28:53 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- References: <3B3AF05A.32388.001@example.com> <m24rt0aqg5.fsf@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <pmVhUD.A.tMH.aQAP7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
SL Baur wrote: > If you're feeling adventurous, you could write a special device > driver. Implement one ioctl which takes the same parameters as > kill(2), but bypasses the normal security checking. I nominate that for "worst abuse of the rules." (Abuse of what rules? It doesn't matter. ANY rules.)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kill(2)
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- References:
- Re: kill(2)
- From: vp@example.com (Viktor Pavlenko)
- Re: kill(2)
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Re: kill(2)
- Prev by Date: Re: kill(2)
- Next by Date: Re: Q.
- Prev by thread: Re: kill(2)
- Next by thread: Re: kill(2)
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |