Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source
- From: gavin.walker@example.com
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:36:37 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <82Zc8D.A.NwD.M9qM7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Just curious. I've read the GPL and a couple of commentaries on it, but as it's never been tested in court it's hard to know what would happen if it ever came to a trial. For example, if a vendor compiles some GPL code into their product, how can it be proven from looking at the distributable binaries? You could maybe prove it with raw C, but obfuscated Java? Probably not. How much change is needed before the code isn't GPL any more, or is it *always* GPL? 0%? 25%? If I wrote a set of very common functions and GPLed them, could I then wave the GPL flag and demand that anyone with similar but expanded functionality in their app show me their source, on the grounds that it'd be very difficult for them to prove that they hadn't seen and used my code? Not likely is it? If it's proven that a vendor reused some GPL code in their application, would the vendor have to release their whole app under GPL, or is there a time window to allow them to reengineer their product using non-GPL code? Even so, they've seen and used the GPL code, so surely there would be bias in writing their clean-room version. Likewise if they chose to reengineer, how does one prove if it has GPL code in there or not? So much is open to interpretation... Gavin Internet jq@example.com - 06/22/2001 11:07 AM Please respond to tlug@example.com To: tlug cc: bcc: Gavin WALKER Subject: Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source Scott Stone (SStone@example.com) wrote: > hmm. doesn't mention the BSD license at all, I wonder if that's a loop > hole? The BSD license appears to meet with MS approval (judging by their recent public statements on licensing) because it allows you to take the code and create a proprietary fork. The fact that MS would actually create an SDK license that forbids you to even distribute your product with Free Software (under the FSF definition) or its close relatives, or even use Free Software tools to build it says a lot about how scared they are running over what has been built around open source in general and the GPL in particular. Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Technical Meeting: Sat, July 14 13:30- Next Nomikai Meeting: Fri, Aug 10 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki-Mae ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan ___________________________________________________________ This message and any attachments (the "message") are intended solely for the addressees and are confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. -------------------------------------------------- Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sint confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie. ___________________________________________________________
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source
- From: "Frank BENNETT (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJVUlaSVzJS8hISVZJU0lQyVIGyhC?= )" <bennett@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I include a subject header when sending email like mail <email addy> < <filename>
- Next by Date: RE: How can I include a subject header when sending email like mail <email addy> < <filename>
- Prev by thread: Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source
- Next by thread: Re: Microsoft vs. Open Source
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links