Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Web caching
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Web caching
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:55:40 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <F77zi95HfqR77bieLYC0000801d@example.com>; from jean_christian@example.com on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:43:30AM -0000
- References: <F77zi95HfqR77bieLYC0000801d@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <e62Q7B.A.ot.j8BM7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Jean-Christian Imbeault (jean_christian@example.com) wrote: > There reasoning is as follows. Sounds like nonsense to me. Can anyone > comment (with some authority ;) on the soundness of this? My experience with caching in Netscape is that you're a lot better off with it disabled. If you do use it, make it compare the cached version to the actual page every time. If you don't, that part about caching bad pages, half pages, etc., is certainly true. Jonathan
- References:
- Web caching
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Web caching
- Next by Date: RH7.1 ja vs en?
- Prev by thread: Web caching
- Next by thread: RE: Web caching
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links