Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Unicode TTF containing CJK?
- To: Marc Christensen <marc@example.com>
- Subject: Unicode TTF containing CJK?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 01:51:55 +0900
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106111014200.24971-100000@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106111014200.24971-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <7MpBWB.A.MiF.tjkJ7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Christensen <marc@example.com> writes: Marc> Anyone know of some good recommendations for unicode Marc> truetype fonts which have good CJK and other language Marc> characters sets? As far as I know there are none, period. Not even from Microsoft, although this may have changed over the last year. The problem is that all fonts to date are either rather incomplete or are pasted together from Unicode subsets, which don't always match. Microsoft's best come damn close, though. IIRC only Icelandic and Turkish (Latin 5?) had "anomolies" in the extensions of Courier and Arial to Unicode. Marc> Many references to this font states that it is a Unicode Marc> font but when I install the font, and get a listing of which Marc> font's the file contained, it lists all iso8859 encodings. Yep. Unicode doesn't mean you're prohibited from subsetting. This is especially important in fonts because it's entirely unclear what the Japanese equivalent of (say) Courier is. Marc> The GNU-unifont lists all it's font's as being iso10646 Marc> encoded so I assume that that is the iso specification for Marc> unicode - right? Sort of. ISO 10646 specifies a universal coded character set. Unicode specifies not only the CCS (which in fact is delegated to the ISO working group for 10646), but also many other aspects of text handling. Sometimes "ISO 10646" is used to mean a 4-byte wide character encoding, but that is technically incorrect. The proper usage is UTF-32 (and UCS-4, which is deprecated). Marc> So, is iso8859 a subset of unicode? Is Unicode a superset Marc> of 8859? Yes and no. The characters of the ISO 8859 encodings are a subset of ISO 10646, but except for ISO 8859/1, they are not subencodings. That is, the encoded value of 8859/1 characters is always the same in 10646 but this is not true for other 8859/N sets. Marc> What other TTFs are available besides Cyberbit? Commercial Marc> and free? I don't know of any other free TTFs with as much coverage as Cyberbit. AFAIK the GNU unifont is not available as TTF, it's X11 BDF. The same is true for the X11 unifont for the xterm (if that's different from the GNU unifont, which I never did get clarified). Marc> Anyone tried Agfa/s Monotype? Are there ay good free Marc> unicode fonts arownd? My preference is to use a substrate like Mule which can present each language in fonts designed for it, rather than limiting me to unifonts. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unicode TTF containing CJK?
- From: Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>
- References:
- Unicode TTF containing CJK?
- From: Marc Christensen <marc@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: (slightly) offtopic- radio modems
- Next by Date: RE: Linux 8.0
- Prev by thread: Re: A newbie, which is me
- Next by thread: Re: Unicode TTF containing CJK?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links