Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- To: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:41:52 +0900
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010609190939.G8368@example.com>
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA84B@example.com><200106090302.MAA31536@example.com><20010609110322.A7425@example.com><200106091044.TAA06170@example.com><20010609190939.G8368@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <ebk0CD.A.HlD.qhGJ7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Cozens <simon@example.com> writes: Simon> Right! So the only time anti-monopoly laws should come into Simon> play are when legislators have done something stupid. So it Simon> *is* to protect against legislation. Putting it another Simon> way, anti-monopoly laws reflect the legislature's inability Simon> to keep tabs on itself. Wrong. Anti-monopoly laws regulate the exploitation of asymmetries in bargaining power, the same way that assault laws remedy the asymmetries in the distribution of physical power. The question is how much friction are we willing to put up with in enforcing those regulations. When basic human rights are violated, we spend a lot on police, without thinking too much about it. With anti-monopoly laws, we can make the decisions based on mostly pure economic values. But those are pretty contentious. Most respectable economists agree that the only way to maintain a monopoly franchise in the long run (ie, indefinitely) is with the connivance of the government. They also agree that it is in general possible to raise price above competitive levels in the short run. Just how short "long run" needs to be to make monopoly not worth legislating about, or just how long "short run" needs to be to justify the attention of the regulators, are very much open questions. Both technically and politically. Ie, the question is whether the current balance is appropriate. Not whether there need to be anti-monopoly laws. Linux.ObRef(): If "short run" isn't long enough, Linux distributors will not make enough money to stay in business, and the activity of Linux distribution will have to be supported as charity (Debian) or as a loss leader (all commercial Alpha distros sou-desu). -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 Um, yes, I do this for a living. Why do you ask?
- References:
- RE: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
- Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: "Frank BENNETT (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJVUlaSVzJS8hISVZJU0lQyVIGyhC?= )" <bennett@example.com>
- Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: "Frank BENNETT (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJVUlaSVzJS8hISVZJU0lQyVIGyhC?= )" <bennett@example.com>
- Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux 8.0
- Next by Date: Re: IP Masquerade and rh7.1
- Prev by thread: Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- Next by thread: Re: Offtopic, inappropriate jokes?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links