Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Using older libraries
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Using older libraries
- From: Dennis McMurchy <denismcm@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:01:57 +0900 (KST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <m21yp6t3jv.fsf@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <NJQH5.A.e_D.0miF7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
On 31 May 2001, SL Baur wrote: > Look for a file called compat-libs-5.2-2.i386.rpm and install it. The RedHat 7.1 discs (1,2) that I have only contain the following: ./RedHat/RPMS/compat-libs-6.2-3.i386.rpm, which is already installed. Maybe I should look for the file you've suggested on the 6.x CDROMs. Well, it is indeed found there, but this is the message I get when I try to install it: <root@example.com:/cdrom>$ rpm -i ./RedHat/RPMS/compat-libs-5.2-2.i386.rpm package compat-libs-6.2-3 (which is newer than compat-libs-5.2-2) is already installed So, should I (if it's possible) force the installation anyway, or what? On another track, I had written to the (commercial) suppliers of 'xvscan' to tell them that the sources I had downloaded _four_ years ago weren't compiling properly. Imagine how surprised - and impressed - I was when I had a prompt response inviting me to download the latest binary and sources. I thought that that was service above and beyond the call - the way it should be, but all-too-often isn't. Just this. Cheers, Dennis -- Dennis McMurchy, Sointula, B.C. / Tojinmachi, Fukuoka Canada Japan
- References:
- Re: Using older libraries
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Is my DNS setup "logical"?
- Next by Date: Re: [announcement] 6/1 TLUG nomikai
- Prev by thread: Re: Using older libraries
- Next by thread: Re: Using older libraries
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links