Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:53:40 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <15108.42488.279835.338814@example.com>; from turnbull@example.com on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:32:56PM +0900
- References: <15107.45323.45815.203470@example.com> <006f01c0df4e$10df0bb0$0f01a8c0@example.com> <20010518131224.5E6F.PETER@example.com> <15108.42488.279835.338814@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <PjUa0C.A.GLD.upKB7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Stephen J. Turnball (turnbull@example.com) wrote: > Now I'd like a concise explanation from the CCNAs about the relevance > of Cisco 2611 configuration to Linux.... We'll plead the compare/contrast to ipchains and iptables angle. Yeah, that's our story and we're sticking to it :-)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- References:
- Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- From: Peter Evans <peter@example.com>
- Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- Next by Date: Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- Prev by thread: Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- Next by thread: Re: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links