Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:32:40 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <990022020.3b0289844392a@example.com>; from sven@example.com on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:07:00AM -0500
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- References: <990022020.3b0289844392a@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <FpCZJ.A.26H.j-oA7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
sven@example.com wrote: > SMTP(not sure we wants to allow), Web, and SSH. Outgoing port wouldn't > have to be blocked I believe. It would be good to block outgoing packets if the source address does not match your subnet to prevent spoofing. -- Tobias nya~ni ?
- References:
- Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- From: sven@example.com
- Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Prev by Date: Re: cutting and pasting into vim in a kterm
- Next by Date: Source of virus.
- Prev by thread: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Next by thread: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |