Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Kernel Upgrade and strange RAM problem.
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Kernel Upgrade and strange RAM problem.
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:43:10 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-2022-jp"
- References: <3AEF9652.AA5A9C5E@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <LLG7rC.A.3c.U6576@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Venkatesh Raghavan wrote: > My system has 1GB RAM and the ML7.2 boot shows > 1024 MB RAM at the login screen (as below) > However the ML8.0 boot shows only 1005MB RAM at the > login screen (as below) Your quotation of the ML8.0 boot showed a strange-looking error message concerning a RAM disk. My completely novice, intuitive guess about this is that the RAM disk driver reserved some memory (maybe 16MB) and then the kernel tried but failed to change the memory mapping. My completely novice, intuitive guess is that this looks like a bug in at least one of these components. If the kernel changed its opinion on whether to count portions of megabytes (i.e. the part of the lowest megabyte that isn't occupied by BIOS ROM and stone age video buffers, and the part of the highest megabyte that's occupied by ACPI data) then maybe 1 or 2 MB also get subtracted. This still leaves a small discrepancy. > What "BIOS-provided physical RAM map" mean? When the PC is first powered up, the BIOS does a limited amount of testing and detection of devices and reading the partition table on the first hard disk, etc. Later, the BIOS provides information to the OS (and directly to application programs if the OS is sufficiently primitive) about the observations the BIOS made.
- References:
- Kernel Upgrade and strange RAM problem.
- From: Venkatesh Raghavan <raghavan@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: DNS question, maybe
- Next by Date: Re: Future of open source I18N [was: Setting Deafult Font Size in X]
- Prev by thread: Kernel Upgrade and strange RAM problem.
- Next by thread: Re: Future of open source I18N [was: Setting Deafult Font Size in X]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links