Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: exim and bcc
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: exim and bcc
- From: Jim Tittsler <jwt-tlug@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:51:05 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010301141332.X16710@example.com>; from tom@example.com on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:13:32PM +0900
- Organization: 7J1AJH/AI8A Tokyo
- References: <20010301141332.X16710@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <cgtRJC.A.pO.bFfn6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:13:32PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > I use exim as my local mta on my machine at home and all mail goes > out through it. I've noticed though that if I send a Bcc: it is > visable on the receiving end for all parties which is bad behaviour > and not what I intended. Isn't this a muttism? I use: unset write_bcc in my .muttrc to keep it from generating a header (the bcc addresses only go in the envelope).
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: exim and bcc
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
- References:
- exim and bcc
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: exim and bcc
- Next by Date: Re: exim and bcc
- Prev by thread: Re: exim and bcc
- Next by thread: Re: exim and bcc
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links